Neil Hester

"Curiouser and curiouser!" ~Alice, for what good is the mind without a sense of wonder and whim?

All poems © Neil Hester unless otherwritten
~Primary domain of LAEvanesce~

My Photo
Name: Neil Hester
Location: Texas, United States

Brief Bio: My name is Neil Hester. I like poetry. I wear briefs, but not bios. Well, boxer briefs. Though I am "bio"logical. And "brief"logical, come to think of it. Anyhow... poetry is good for your health; poems make you well, very much like prunes. Poems, however, don't have that devilish tendency to shrivel up (or down) and whatnot~

Wednesday, June 24, 2009

DSI Update

Recently, Dan Schneider added a ratings system to his interview series (yes, you can rate interviews, too!). There are a lot of great, in-depth interviews, but there are some duds in there as well, from people who are jerks or give shallow/rushed answers. Personally, I think a ratings system is a good way to direct people to the worthwhile interviews and let them skip the bad ones (unless they're just curious). Jess also talked about this change recently, and there's one point that she makes that I want to single out. Some people blame Dan for the bad interviews, and Jess wrote: "...if you're gonna blame Dan for all of the bad responses then by that logic you have to credit him for all of the good ones too." That's a good point, and there are definitely more quality interviews than there are bad ones.

Additional reader comments were also taken into consideration, but the idea was later dropped because the list of interviews would become too cluttered with a bunch of comments floating around (good call, since quality web design isn't about fancy jazz and cramming in as much content as possible, but about clarity and easy navigation). However, Jess thought I should go ahead and post the comment on the James Emanuel interview that I unwittingly wrote. Hey, if it's not going up on Cosmo, it might as well go up here, right?

~~~

"A real writer is lucky to find enough time to write, and he will not complain when The Muse is out to lunch. Even without a spade, he will dig in."

Young artists should always leave themselves open to the wisdom and works of older artists; doing so is nothing short of a necessity. However, a young artist must be selective in who and what they learn from, lest they are swept up in a current of bad artists, bad art, and bad ideas about art. I can think of few (if any) works I’ve read that offer more wisdom on writing, in and of itself, than Dan’s interview with James Emanuel. Great insights abound. Furthermore, the poems contained in the interview are a must-read for those unfamiliar with Emanuel’s writing, and every answer provided by Emanuel is precise, polite, and insightful. A must-read, especially for young artists.

~~~~~~~

Finally, I think it would really awesome if, sometime in the future, Dan Schneider interviews Jessica Schneider, as a special edition~ Fun stuff!

Take Care,
~Neil

Thursday, June 11, 2009

This Blog Receives a 7.3/10

I've been a fan of video games for most of my life. In fact, I even argued that game design is a form of art in some cases.

I've also enjoyed reading books for most of my life. I don't have to point out that books are a medium of art (though I just did).

However, I'd say that I started reading video game reviews long before I started reading book reviews (if "long before" can even apply to someone my age). Y'know what's great about video game reviews? They reach a numerical verdict for every single video game. Most reviews specifically note the quality of both technical aspects (which you *cannot* overlook in a video game the way you can in a novel) and creative aspects, then give an overall rating with these things in mind. So, you say this game is a 7.8/10? I might play it if it's something I'm interested in specifically; otherwise, it's not quite good enough. 4.5/10? Never touching it. 9.6/10? That's worth playing no matter what it's about. That's still how I use these reviews, and it helps that the reviewers talk about both main aspects of the games (technicality and creativity) and then give a clear verdict.

Then I started reading some book reviews here and there, both to find something interesting and because I was curious because I had heard how, um, bad they can be. Most book reviews don't use numerical ratings. Now, some people can write a perfectly sound and clear review without using numbers; I know that. However, after reading several reviews, most of what I find is mush. Almost every book is "good" or better, and critics often talk about how you will "like" or "love" the book. Look how human this book is! Look at how this book is about abortion/drugs/alcoholism/transsexuals! It must be good! The whole time, I'm thinking, "Okay, fine. But is the book well-written?"

The best reasons I can come up with for why people reviewing paintings and novels don't use numbers are that a) These works often originate from a single person and reviewers don't want to come down on one person (we know whose to blame when there's only one person responsible), b) Many artists function in a circle of sycophants who praise each other ceaselessly, and c) The people working in these fields tend to be more touchy-feely than those working in, say, movies and video games. Reason "a" is especially ridiculous; screw their feelings! Just because they've enter the field of art doesn't mean they should be exempt from receiving just evaluation; adults should be properly criticized for performing poorly in their chosen profession, and that includes artists of all sorts. Reason "b" almost completely invalidates any criticism coming from involved individuals. The main effect of reason "c" is the reign of using "like/dislike" in criticism instead of "good/bad". It's easier to avoid hurting people's feelings by using the former (and hurting people's feelings is a no-no, because of reasons "a" and "b").

But, wait! Exactly how similar are books and video games? In fact, how can you even juxtapose the two? Well, for reviewing purposes, here's a list of similarities between the two:

~~~

~*Both contain technical aspects which can be horrible, great, or anything inbetween (this is what gets overlooked by so many literary reviewers)
~*Both contain creative aspects which can be horrible, great, or anything inbetween (literary reviewers tend to disguise "horrible" as "different" or "unique")
~*Both involve the combination of technical aspects and creative aspects to create a final product; the quality of this product can be horrible, great, or anything inbetween

~~~~~~~

For reviewing purposes, there's enough similarity between the two to approach both with the same basic mindset.

I realize that using number ratings wouldn't make for instantly concise and insightful reviewers (note the majority of movie critics). However, it would help clear up the mush a *little* bit ("good" book #1 may be a 3.5/5, while "good" book #2 may be a 4/5). It would also give reviewers a standing number for each book, so that they can compare future books with ease.

I doubt the shift to numbers will ever occur, for the reasons listed above. However, I can give at least one example of numbers being used for literature: Dan Schneider uses numerical ratings in his This Old Poem series. Scroll down for his rubric, which is sound. If you can give reasons for your judgment, why not assign number ratings to poetry? People are still free to like/dislike all poems as they please, no matter their rating, but good/bad can be accurately determined by objective criticism. The same applies to game design, novels, comic strips, sculptures, tattoos, and any other form of art, high or low.

I'm done. I think I'll go play that 9.6/10 video game now. Good stuff!

Take Care,
~Neil

LAEvaside: It's June. Also, for the record, the title rating is a joke (I hope). [/laevaside]

Monday, May 25, 2009

Almost Done

I've been gone lately. Why? Wrapping up high school. I've but a few graduation rehearsals, senior checkout, and a couple "finals", and I'll be done. Go me.

Another reason I've been gone is because I performed in a Les Miserables/Seussical mixed concert last Thursday and Friday. Lots of rehearsals. I haven't seen Seussical all the way through, but I have the 10th anniversary concert version of Les Miserables on VHS, and I recommend watching it. Les Miserables is the best musical I've seen in terms of, well, music, even if following the story can be difficult in a few parts. Here's a couple of the songs:

~~~

Bring Him Home

Empty Chairs at Empty Tables

~~~~~~~

I ended up singing Empty Chairs, which I enjoyed; dramatic is fun, since more acting can be mixed in with the singing. Anyhow, I've not read the book Les Miserables, but I will say that the musical (or, at least, the concert version) clocks in at somewhere around two hours, so it's not the time sink that 1200'ish pages is.

The next act consisted of various Seussical songs. I've always been a fan of Seuss (though with Seuss books, it's important to note that without the combination of whimsical words and illustration, the books would not be great children's books; one without the other just wouldn't work). There aren't many good recordings of Seussical online, but I will say that I ended up singing "A Day for the Cat in the Hat", which was great fun, since, well, dressing up and singing as the Cat in the Hat is simply awesome (and I had a large red box I started the song in).

Anyhow, enough about the musical. I just thought I'd do a lighter post as a "coming back" type entry. Hopefully I'll have some more interesting things to say in the near future. Oh, and it's May!

Take Care,
~Neil

Monday, March 16, 2009

Five Cubed

Well, it's mid-March. Life is happening to me and preventing me from blogging as much as I'd like; but then, I suppose most people don't hold blogs through high school (it's strange to think that I founded this blog when I was 15 years old). Again, thanks for the support lately (especially Anthony, who recently featured one of my poems), and here's to another 25 posts, which will come, however slowly:

~~~

~*C~ See?

~*Too Many Facelifts~ Hollywood isn't the only one suffering from this.

~*Begin at the Beginning/Middle/End~ Do it!

~*A Conversational Sonnet~ There's an interesting conversation in the comments, too.

~*Totoro!~ You still need to watch this one, Jess~

~*Performance vs. Composition~ Different, indeed.

~*Aesop's Fables~ Read them to your children and whatnot.

~*In Love (Features)~ Three poems- one from each of three wonderful writers and supporters~

~~~~~~~

Take Care,
~Neil

Wednesday, February 11, 2009

Inspirational Poems for Valentine's Day

Hey, guys! It's February! I've been reading some wonderful poetry lately, and, because Valentine's Day is a day for beautiful words and truly heartfelt writing, I thought I would share with everyone!

If you don't understand what a lover or a friend is, this poem is just for you!

Sometimes, you get into deep conversations with a significant other. This is a great example of that!

It can be hard to find the perfect words to give to your sweetheart at this most romantic time of the year. However, this poem is here to help! What person could resist "fuzzy song logic"?

And, if you're still having trouble, perhaps you can "reference" this poem!

It's perfectly fine to use someone else words to express your sentiments. It's the thought that counts!

Maybe you've had this happen to you before!

Bye, guys!

~Neil

Tuesday, January 27, 2009

Alexander? Not Good, But...

It's January, and we have a new president. Rejoice! I watched a good deal of the inauguration at school, and most of it was interesting. But, the poem reeked, as Anthony pointed out. In fact, I think Obama might be a better poet than Elizabeth Alexander, whose poem, "Praise Song for the Day", was a serious drag and a definite low of the proceedings. And yet, worse poetic travesties have taken place before:

~~~

So say the Asian, the Hispanic, the Jew
The African and Native American, the Sioux,
The Catholic, the Muslim, the French, the Greek
The Irish, the Rabbi, the Priest, the Sheikh,
The Gay, the Straight, the Preacher,
The privileged, the homeless, the Teacher.
They hear. They all hear
The speaking of the Tree.

~~~~~~~

Wait. What if I follow Scientology or Pastafarianism? All joking aside, let's look at another excerpt:

~~~

You, who gave me my first name, you
Pawnee, Apache and Seneca, you
Cherokee Nation, who rested with me, then
Forced on bloody feet, left me to the employment of
Other seekers--desperate for gain,
Starving for gold.

You, the Turk, the Swede, the German, the Scot ...
You the Ashanti, the Yoruba, the Kru, bought
Sold, stolen, arriving on a nightmare
Praying for a dream.

~~~~~~~

It's very universal. O you, the Bishopee, the Ham, the Bacteriaman, keep praying for that dream. I wish I knew so many denominations so I could write well like she does.

Oh right, "she". Maya Angelou. That's the one. Y'know, they actually made a book with *just* this poem in it, and sold it for, oh, 6-7 bucks, if I remember correctly. Real sad. So, embrace the Alexander number read at Obama's inauguration, with the knowledge that it could have been far worse.

Take Care,
~Neil

Friday, December 19, 2008

In Love (Features)

Yes, yes, I've been gone for awhile now. Some combination of schoolwork, music, and social time has prevented me, I suppose. Anyhow, I just finished taking my last final, so I'm more or less free, schoolwise. Anthony and Jess have featured poems lately, and they're both excellent, so I suggest that you jump over and read:

~~~

Her Kansas by Jessica Schneider

~~~~~

Cheetah Conceived in Circuiting Speed by Anthony Zanetti

~~~~~~~

Now, to continue the run of features- I've been writing more love poetry than usual as of late, and it helps to read both classical and modern approaches to the subject. Love is undoubtedly the most worn topic of poetry, so it's easy to write badly or boringly about it, since it possesses no originality in itself; you have to take a unique approach. I posted one entry on love poems almost two years ago, where I highlighted a few of my favorites. Here's another:

~~~

In Love

The only word is Love. It is what binds
things more securely than the o and v,
which are bereft without the l and e
to give them structure, if not grand design.
Nothing is permanent, as Love proves this
so, as well the uselessness of Beauty,
without Love to engage it. Can you see
the parallel? Love is just what it is,
as well is Beauty, which mouths the full o,
which sounds like a u (the short vowel sound),
to become part of the structure that grounds
only what matters to those, in the know,
  who see what is loosened by loveless minds
  unable to ask: Where did Beauty go?

By Dan Schneider

~~~~~~~

Did I mention something about unique approaches? First, we get a comparison between the binding power of Love and letters of "love". Then the relationship between Love and Beauty is introduced, but it's not the typical "I love you, (because) you're beautiful" relationship; "Beauty is useless without Love" is far more dramatic and unusual. Structurally, it's interesting how well the observations about the nature of Love and the spelling/phonetics of love tie into each other. Combine that with great music (side note on rhyme: the phrase "Love proves" strikes me as interesting, because "love" and "prove" are often used with each other as end rhymes [after all, there are only so many things you can match with "love"], but in this poem the two words are right next to each other), and you've got a highly atypical and wonderful love sonnet.

In other news, I got into Rice University, but I probably won't be going due to money issues. I'll probably attend a public university for my undergrad, then move to some prestigious location for grad school.

I suppose it's December. I really ought to go Christmas shopping.

Take Care,
~Neil

Sunday, November 16, 2008

Thinly Veiled Racism

I know that the election has passed (hooray for Obama! though my prediction was a little too conservative), but I see and hear so much crap on Facebook, on MySpace, and at school that I just have to highlight some items. This will be the last blog entry on the election, promise. Anyhow, this election really pulled out a part of peoples' personalities that they normally keep more well-hidden. Anyhow, let's lead into the Facebook statuses. However, because of the format of Facebook statuses, we need a name to assign these statuses to. Let me go to the Sarah Palin Baby Name Generator and type in "Idiot"...

"Idiot, if you were born to Sarah Palin, your name would be:
Froth Moonshine Palin"

Okay, our person is "Froth Moonshine Palin"! Hooray!

~~~

Froth Moonshine Palin:

guesses she'll just have to cling to her guns and religion.

is moving out of the country if we can actually let him be president. Come on.

is this world is going to the dumps. thanx for electing the anti-christ america.

is thrilled about commie lite America.

BOO OBAMA, lets all move to mexico.

is mourning for the death of america...

is we are all doomed. I feel a secession by our great state. Plan B: Australia.

is wanting to secede.

is can't believe that really just happened!

is We The People...

cant wait for next year! I've always wanted to be socialist...Karl Marx is my hero!

is this the beginning of the end.

is it's the beginning of the end..

The world is over! Get out of the United Socialist States of America while you still can!

is its official...I am losing faith in the elections...

if there is a God he will make sure McCain wins. OBAMA=Antichrist.

is ...

is moving to CANADA! we're all gonna die.


~~~~~~~

I think moving to Canada would be pointless if "we're all gonna die" anyhow. Now, regardless of whether or not you're Christian, pretty much all the above comments are from folks who profess the faith. It is very morally and religiously sound to freak out about Obama, apparently.

Here's the kicker, off of MySpace. My personal favorite:

~~~

ok honestly people i hate obama with a burning passion, and i think that he's the worst thing for america right now, but we should def pray for our leaders.

plus, on the brightside....


he'll be assasinated.

rejoice!


~~~~~~~

Let's pray for someone who we hope will be "assasinated"! People are so smart.

~Neil

Tuesday, November 04, 2008

Election Day

It's November the 4th- hopefully everyone's gotten out to vote. Voting on election day is not too much of a hassle where I live, so I went out with my family this afternoon and we all put in our votes for Obama within fifteen minutes. While Obama will not be winning Texas, a stronger Democratic showing this year could potentially begin a movement towards a more contested Texas, come future elections. Also, voting feels like a physical representation of my opinion; I know that sounds kinda sappy, but I gained genuine satisfaction voting for someone I believe will lead this country in the right direction. Combined with the novelty of voting (as this was my first time), it was exciting. Simple and pedestrian, but exciting nonetheless.

Jess posted her election prediction, which includes a fantastic map, as well as a link to an interactive map you can use to predict the outcome of the election. Personally, I'm going with a slightly more optimistic outlook than Jess: I think McCain will take NC, IN, MO, ND, and MT, but I think Obama will take FL and OH. I'm fairly confident he'll win PA, too, but he doesn't need it to win. The rest of the swing states (NM, NV, NH, etc.) have been drifting toward Obama for awhile, so I think he'll take most of them.

While my prediction is certainly not the most educated one out there, I thought it would be interesting to give it a go: 338 for Obama is where I'm placing my marker.

Thursday, October 16, 2008

Anonymity- The Enabler of Stupidity

Or, perhaps, merely the exposure of it.

It's a tough call.

Anyhow, I recently read an article on Obama's purchase of air time: 30 minute on both NBC and CBS. I normally don't scroll down and read the comments, but I decided to give the thread below a quick look, and some of the stuff I read was both amusing and somewhat alarming. Hold your cookies:

Notice: None of the below comments are mine. Yes, that should be obvious, but the following comments deserve to be handled carefully.

~~~

BARF! OBAMA NEEDS TO GET OVER HIMSELF! A 30 MINUTE SPOT??? DOES HE THINK HE CAN CONTINUE TO PULL THE WOOL OVER OUR EYES? OBAMA IS AN ARROGANT, CORRUPT, LYING HOMOSEXUAL. HE CAN KEEP HIS SOCIALIST PLAN FOR HIS PRESIDENCY OF ACORN WHEN THEY ARE ALL IN PRISON!

Obama - radical leftist socialist.
McCain - proven leader, war hero.
Does class rank really matter??

It sounds like Obama is worried about the way he's coming across in the debates and wants some unchallenged air time where his inexperience will not be highlighted.

OBAMA: THE MANCHURIAN CANDIDATE
30 MIN. OF LIES FROM MR. EMPTY AND HIS PRESS HOGS

NOBAMA 08
WHY DOES obama HATE WHITE PEOPLE SO MUCH? 20 YEARS IN A WHITE HATING USA HATING CHURCH, HAVING CROOKS AS FRIENDS, CAUSING STOCK MARKETS TO FALL BECAUSE HE LEADS IN POLLS, BEING A MUSLIM AND BEING BLACK AND THINKING WHITE PEOPLE OWE HIM...I VOTED FOR JIMMY CARTER IN 76 AND TWICE FOR BILL CLINTON IN THE 90'S AND CLINTON IN 08 PRIMARIES.....NO HOW NO WAY NOBAMA 08!!!!!!!!!!DON'T VOTE PARTY IN 08...VOTE WHATS RIGHT FOR YOUR GOD, YOUR COUNTRY, YOUR FAMILY, YOURSELF.......WE MUST VOTE FOR JOHN MCAIN AND A BREATH OF FRESH AIR SARAH PALIN!!!!!!!!!!OHIO OHIO OHIO

I truly believe that Obama is the Anti-Christ and if he gets elected we all better start making peace with our Maker!

Obama supported infanticide, typical arab american terrorist parading as an african american because hes a fraud in every aspect of his life..

Since we are not a communist state, yet, I can refuse to watch Comrad Obama.

Obama is as false as the styrofoam columns in Denver
stadium. Only mentally blind people could follow such
a looser.

You can put it on every television show on the planet for 24/7 until Nov. 4 and hold a loaded gun to my head.... I STILL wouldn't watch this lying SOB. I just wish he would go back to his mosque in Kenya and leave us alone.

What do Obama and Osama have in common?
They both have friends that bombed the the Pentigon!

Well, I'm going to bed... I am a republican and I actually have a job to go to in the morning.. I'm not a left-wing nut that lives off welfare and government checks!!

THE REAL REASON THE STOCK MARKETS AROUND THE WORLD ARE TANKING IS BECAUSE EVERYONE IS SCARRED OF WHAT WILL HAPPEN TO THE WORLD ECONOMY IF OBAMA IS ELECTED PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES.

Obama=Ayers=Stalin=Hitler...they are all the same.

I'll be honest. I am not voting for Obama for one reason. It's because he's black. I don't like blacks and I don't trust them. They are dangerous and stupid. They have poor morals. I am a proud Republican, a proud Conservative and a proud American. It is wonderful to know that so many other true Americans agree with me. We must stop the blacks and mongrel races from stealing our country. Think of the founding fathers. Were any blacks there when the Constitution was written? Let us return to the traditions that made America great. Join me and other true Americans in drawing a line in the sand and keeping this mongrel and his Muslim brethren from invading our White House. VOTE MCCAIN/PALIN ON NOVEMBER 4TH.

The end of democracy is when you have 51% parasite voters (dems) and only 49% host voters (repubs)

Obama supporters are homosexuals and losers. Get a job and a life.

~~~~~~~

The stupidity above is both awesome and scary. Sure, I can always use a laugh, but these people will all be voting. It shouldn't affect the actual outcome, but the idea of people whose ideas are so warped voting at all is sad. Anyhow, here are a few random, non-anti-Obama comments from the same thread:

~~~

You all are friggin idiots...cept me.
and except the Palin fans......you da best.
Go Sarah !

I'm a staunch McCain supporter, but even I have to admit it's over.
Hopefully Obama will surprise me.

Every one of these anti Obama comments has underlying racism. I fear for his life.

Sigh... I'm in love with Barack Obama. He's Super Intelligent, he's Suave & Debonaire, he's Truthful & Thoughtful, he's just a Beautiful & Fabulous person. If I could vote for him 100 times I would. I love you Barack Obama!!!

~~~~~~~

And, finally, one apt comment that I will use to sum this entry up:

~~~

The lack of civility in these replies is absolutely astounding.
Thank God for the anonymity of the internet.

~~~~~~~

Take Care,
~Neil